|
|
Post by phantom on May 12, 2007 19:55:57 GMT -5
Yes I do know how averages work, but I see generalizations made about republicans that get my ire up, which is what prompted me to respond in the first place. Generally, I try to stay away from the political forums because it seems that posters forget that it is okay to have differing viewpoints.
|
|
|
|
Post by marked on May 13, 2007 15:34:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by marked on May 13, 2007 15:37:49 GMT -5
Gee marked, do ya think anyone in Texas has a three digit IQ? I've been told that I do, (even higher than the 113 average in Conneticut) but I voted republican, so maybe the results were not valid! If you're talking about the 2000 election, you're right, the results weren't valid. If you're referring to your I.Q, I'm sure your parents wouldn't lie to you. Unless it was a self-esteem thing, then maybe. |
|
|
|
Post by phantom on May 13, 2007 16:25:23 GMT -5
Nice insult considering not only do you not know me, but you don't even know anything about me. I feel priviledged to have joined the ranks of the insulted. Unk, move over...there's a new kid in town.
|
|
|
|
Post by marked on May 14, 2007 8:16:31 GMT -5
Nice insult considering not only do you not know me, but you don't even know anything about me. I feel priviledged to have joined the ranks of the insulted. Is that like 'privileged'? |
|
|
|
Post by phantom on May 14, 2007 18:48:30 GMT -5
So, the pot calls the kettle black? Let's go through all the posts and see who has more misspellings, shall we? Never mind, I work for a living...you might have more time.
|
|
|
|
Post by marked on May 14, 2007 19:08:46 GMT -5
So, the pot calls the kettle black? Let's go through all the posts and see who has more misspellings, shall we? Never mind, I work for a living...you might have more time. It's you. |
|
|
|
Post by marked on May 14, 2007 19:10:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by marked on May 14, 2007 19:15:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by phantom on May 14, 2007 19:32:36 GMT -5
Don't think so. But I can think of much worse problems to have.
|
|
|
|
Post by marked on May 15, 2007 12:29:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by time2fly on May 16, 2007 11:00:19 GMT -5
The other 2 girls are pretty. Natalie...not so much. I think it is because the other 2 have a natural beauty to them...and Natalie seems to cake on the make up for the most part.
|
|
|
|
Post by marked on May 16, 2007 11:20:14 GMT -5
The other 2 girls are pretty. Natalie...not so much. I think it is because the other 2 have a natural beauty to them...and Natalie seems to cake on the make up for the most part. Definitely. The brunette gets my motor running, but Natalie has more talent than the other 2 put together. |
|
|
|
Post by marked on May 16, 2007 11:23:01 GMT -5
The other 2 girls are pretty. Natalie...not so much. I think it is because the other 2 have a natural beauty to them...and Natalie seems to cake on the make up for the most part. |
|
|
|
Post by marked on May 22, 2007 16:15:03 GMT -5
|
|
